|
Within chess, the endgame (or even prevent game or even ending) refers to the stage of the game whenever there are couple of pieces left on the board.
A line between middlegame & endgame is often non clear, and might occur bit by bit or even by having a apostophy test exchange of two or three pairs of pieces. A endgame, but, tends to develop quite different characteristics from either a middlegame, & a players keep close at hand quite different strategic concerns. Particularly, pawns become more crucial; endgames typically revolve in the arethe of attempting to promote a pawn by advancing it to the eighth rank. A king, which has to become protected in the middlegame owing to the threat of checkmate, becomes a hard piece in the endgame. It may become bring round the centre of the board & be the utile assaultive piece.
Numerous humans keep close at hand composed endgame studies, endgame positions which are solved by selecting the win for even white once no visible way of winning, or the draw while it seems white must lose.
Endgames may be classified based on data from a nature and severity of pieces that remain. Occasionally most common types of endgames come discussed beneath.
Common types of endgames
Basic checkmates
Which are actually positions where of these side has single a king & the more side has of these or even deuce pieces & might checkmate a opposing king, sustaining the pieces working together with their king. The queen or even the rook might easy checkmate a lone king. Watch Wikibooks - Chess/The Endgame for a demonstration one ii mates. Both bishops could well checkmate a single king (provided a bishops march on paired colour squares). the bishop & knight can as well checkmate a single king, although the checkmate procedure is hanker (as much as 33 moves by having right play) & is hard for a streaming video player world health organization doesn't understand the correct system.
2 knights just can't click checkmate against the single king, however whenever a weaker side besides has a pawn, checkmate is periodically conceivable, because positions which would become stalemate without a pawn are non stalemate by owning the extra pawn. Whenever a pawn is blocked by a knight behind the Troitzky line, the knights have a hanker theoretical win. There are another positions while a pawn is past a Troitzky line where a knights might inflict checkmate, however a procedure is hanker & hard. Around either out break, around competition a fifty move rule will usually effect in the game existence drawn number one.
King and pawn
King & pawn endgames require single kings and pawns on one or even each sides. Cecil Purdy said "Pawn endings are to chess as putting is to golf."
Generating the passed pawn is crucial (the passed pawn is 1 which doesn't stand an opposing pawn in its file or even in adjacent files in its way to promotion). Nimzovich once said that the passed pawn has a "lust to expand". An outside passed pawn is particularly deadly. A point of this occurs as decoy — when a defending king is preventing it from either queening, a assaultive king wins pawns on the other side.
Opposition is an important technique that is used to gain an advantage. Whilst 2 kings come con, it is on the equivalent file (or rank) with an empty square separating the two. A streaming video player getting a move loses a opposition. He must move his king & allow a opponent's king to advance. Note yet that a opposition occurs as means to an prevent, which is penetration into a enemy position. In case a assaulter potty penetrate while forgoing a opposition, he should clean soh.
Understand King and pawn versus king for the important ending of the king & pawn versus the king.
Knight and pawn
Knight and pawn endgames feature clever maneuvering by the knights to capture opposing pawns. When the knight is unfortunate at chasing the passed pawn, these are the idealistic piece to prevent a passed pawn. Knights potty't lose the tempo, so knight & pawn endgames use great deal within green using king & pawn endgames. An outside passed pawn potty outweigh the exchange secure passed pawn, unlike king & pawn endgames. a knight blockading a secure passed pawn attacks the shielder, when the knight blockading an outside passed pawn is somewhat away from action.
Bishop and pawn
}
Bishop and pawn endgames come within 2 distinctly different variants. In case a opposing bishops last on a equivalent color of square, the mobility of the bishops occurs as important factor. The bad bishop is one that is hemmed in by pawns of its own color, and has the burden of defending them.
Endings by using bishops of paired color, meaning that 1 bishop works in a lightly squares, the more of these working on dark squares, come ill-famed for their drawish character. Several players inside the unfortunate position keep around saved up themselves from either the loss by futures trading down to such an endgame. It is typically drawn potentially whilst of these side has the ii pawn benefit since the weaker side could produce a blockade in the squares which his bishop operates on. Interestingly a weaker side should typically try to produce his bishop bad by placing his pawns on the equivalent color of his bishop sequentially to defend his remaining pawns, thereby creating an impregnable fortress.
A diagram on the correct, from either Molnar-Nagy, Hungary 1966, illustrates the conception of proficient bishop vs. bad bishop, opposition, zugzwang, and outside passed pawn. White wins sustaining Unity. e6! Bxe6 Two. Bc2 Bf7 Triplet. BeQuaternion Be8 4. KeFive Bd7 5. Bxg6! (Understand algebraic chess notation.)
Rook and pawn
Rook and pawn endgames are typically drawn around spite of a single side with an additional pawn. (Around a select few instances, deuce additional pawns are non plenty to win.) An additional pawn is harder to convert to the wwithin in the rook & pawn endgame than any more nature and severity of endgame except the bishop endgame by using bishops in paired colors. A swell master Tartakower once jocularly said "All rook and pawn endings are drawn". Rook endings come probably a deepest & virtually all swell deliberate endgames. It is a 2nd usual nature & severity of endgame around practice, behind rook and minor piece versus rook and minor piece (by having pawns).
3 system of thumb on rooks come worth noting:
Rooks should nigh universally exist as set behind passed pawns, whether 1's possess or even a opposing's (a Tarrasch rule).
Rooks may be unfortunate defenders relative to their attacking nature and severity. Then these are typically adept to sacrifice the pawn for activity. This is especially therefore in the as a consequence case
a rook on the seventh rank may wreak mayhem among the opponent's pawns. the power of a rook on the seventh rank is non confined to the endgame. A classic lesson is Capablanca–Tartakower, New York 1924 (view [http://www.angelfire.com/games3/AJs01Downloads/html_stuff/gcg_sh_capa-tart.html annotated game without diagrams] or [http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102104 Java script board])
An crucial winning position in the endgame of the rook & pawn versus the rook is the therefore-alleged Lucena position. Whenever a side using a pawn may email a Lucena position, he wins. Notwithstanding, there are many crucial drawing techniques like a Philidor position, the back rank defence (rook on a number one rank, for rook pawns & knight pawns sole), the frontal defence, & a short side defence. a general rule is that whenever the weaker side's king might develop to the queening square of the pawn, the game occurs as draw & otherwise these are a win, however there are numbers of exceptions.
Queen and pawn
Inside Queen and pawn endings, passed pawns have paramount importance, because a queen could escort it to the queening square alone. A advancement of a passed pawn outweighs the total of pawns. A defender must resort to perpetual prevent. These endings come oft pleasantly yearn affairs. For an case of the Queen & pawn endgame watch Kasparov versus The World — Kasparov won although he had fewer pawns because his was other advanced.
Asymmetric positions
Endings using asymmetrical piece possession come less most common. The rook is worth about 2 pawns + the bishop or even the knight. The bishop & knight come worth about the rook & the pawn, & the queen is worth the rook, the minor piece (bishop or knight) and a pawn. 3 pawns come typically plenty to win against the minor piece, however deuce pawns seldom come.
Still, using rooks on a board, a bishop typically outweighs the pawns. This is because a bishop defends against enemy rook attacks, patch a bishop's have rook attacks enemy pawns & reduces a enemy rook to passivity. This relates to Rule Two by using rooks (above).
The bishop is normally worth to the higher degree a knight. The bishop is especially worthful once there are pawns in two wings of the board, since it could intercept the two quickly.
Endings with no pawns
Besides a basic checkmates, there are more endings by having there is no pawns. a select few one come: the queen wins against a rook, however the third rank defense per rook is hard for the human to crack, unless he knows how else.
The queen commonly wins against the bishop & knight, however there exists 1 drawing fortress positioNorth: B in b2, N on d4 & a symmetry-related positions, forming a barrier against the enemy king's approach. An additional position is additional articifial: a queen's king get on a1 confined by Ba3 & Nc3 protected by their king.
a queen usually has the theoretical win against 2 bishops, however numerous average positions need as much as 71 moves (which occurs as draw under the system of competition, view fifty move rule); and there exists of these drawing fort position for the ii bishops. Both knights could usually draw against the queen by setting higher the fort.
The rook versus the minor piece (bishop or knight) is generally a draw. The rook + the minor piece versus the rook is ordinarily the draw; when occurs as queen & the minor piece versus the queen. The queen versus the rook & the minor piece is usually the draw. Naturally, there come positions that are exceptions to these general system.
Fine's rule
Within his landmark book Basic Chess Endings, Reuben Fine inaccurately stated that in endgames while forgoing pawns, at least the benefit of a rook (or even tantamount lesson) is involved to win, by owning 2 exceptions where less of an benefit is sufficient (chapter 9 of the 1st edition). the benefit of the rook corresponds to a 5-point lesson benefit using the traditional relative value of the pieces (pawn=1, knight=Tercet, bishop=Tierce, rook=Cinque, queen=Nine). Them exceptions noted by Mulct come (Single) a double exchange — deuce rooks versus any Two minor pieces, & (2) tetrad minor pieces versus the queen. It turns out that there are many exceptions, however it is endgames that seldom occur within actual games.
The quaternity-point lesson benefit is typically plenty to waround in occasionally endings while forgoing pawns. For instance, the queen wins versus the rook (equally mentioned above, however 31 moves can be mandatory); likewise once when there exists matching extra material on two sides, i personally.e.: the queen & any minor piece versus the rook & any minor piece; the queen & the rook versus deuce rooks; & deuce queens versus the queen & a rook. An additional nature and severity of win by having the quaternity-point poop benefit is the double exchange — two rooks versus any two minor pieces. There come another endgames using quaternary-point poop differences that are usually yearn theoretical wins, however a fifty move rule comes into play in competition because generally additional than L moves come mandatory: ii bishops & the knight versus the rook (68 moves); & deuce rooks & the minor piece versus the queen (82 moves for the bishop, 101 moves for the knight).
The troikthe-point poop benefit can too effect around a forced winside, in a few suits. E.g., the bit of of the subjects of a queen versus deuce minor piece come such positions (when metioned above). Additionally, the tetrad minor pieces win against a queen. Eventually there are a few yearn general theoretical wins by having exclusively a 2- or even 3-point lesson benefit however the fifty move rule usually comes into play because of the total of moves needed: 2 bishops versus the knight (66 moves); the queen & bishop versus 2 rooks (2-point poop benefit, potty necessitate 84 moves); the rook & bishop versus the bishop on the opposite color & the knight (the deuce-point poop benefit, takes as much as 98 moves); & the rook & bishop versus deuce knights (deuce-point poop benefit, however it takes as much as 222 moves!). the total of moves given come a total of moves to convert a endgame to a simplier endgame (or even checkmate), & come from either Fundamental Chess Endings, by Müller & Lamprecht; & Secrets of Pawnless Endings, by John Nunn. Rook & ii bishops five rook & 1 bishop is winning further often than virtually all books believe, because a attacker's king potty advance on a opposite coloured square from either the defender's bishop.
Otherwise a basic checkmates using the queen & by using a rook, the endgames forswearing pawns occur seldom within actual games. the simply one of the two that occurs by using any frequency is the queen versus a rook. So the individual researching endgames should concentrate additional in endings by using pawns (when learning the basic checkmates sustaining the queen & sustaining a rook).
Longest winning ending
Inside October 2005, Marc Bourzutschky & Yakov Konoval announced that the bit of endings of the king, 2 rooks & the knight versus the king & ii rooks potty require as much as 290 moves to convert to a winning endgame (& sextet thomas more moves to checkmate). the ending is thought to become a draw in the main.
General
Generally, a streaming video player by using a poop benefit strains to exchange pieces & email the endgame. In the endgame, these are better for the streaming video player by having supplementary pawns to make sure your not as well numerous pawn exchanges, because it should become won for nothing. Likewise, endings by owning pawns in two sides of the board come lot more comfortable to win. The king & pawn endgame sustaining an outside passed pawn should be the far more leisurely win than the middlegame the rook in the lead.
By using a recent incubation of computer chess, an interesting development has been the creation of endgame databases which are then tables of stored positions estimated by retrograde analysis (such the database is known as the tablebase). The program which incorporates noesis from either such the database is take a breath to play hone chess in reaching any position in the database.
Books on endgames
in this button come occasionally books on chess endgames:
Little, general of these-volume books:
Chess Endings: Requirement Cognition, by Yuri Averbakh, Everyman Chess (possibly away from print inside book form however available in Video) Mostly simple - a good place to begin but not comprehensive sufficiency.
''Essential Chess Endings: a Tournament Streaming video player's Resolution, by James Howell, Batsford. The an expert little, comprehensive book.
Practical Chess Endings, by Paul Keres, R.H.M. Click (away from print). Smashing however away from print.
The Pocket Alternative to Chess Endings, by David Hooper, Bell & Hyman. Jolly adept & interesting.
The Cure to Chess Endings, by Dr. Max Euwe and David Hooper, Dover. Non when informative when a others in that subdivision.
Practical Chess Endings'', by Irving Chernev, Dover. Looks at single endgames, therefore international relations and security network't when informative when a others.
Big, extra comprehensive 1-volume books:
Fundamental Chess Endings, by Karsten Müller and Frank Lamprecht, Gambit Publications. One of a right - comprehensive & modern.
Basic Chess Endings, by Reuben Fine and Pal Benko, McKay. A mother of whole modern endgame books. An old classic by Fine - recently revised by Benko.
''Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual, by Mark Dvoretsky, Russel Enterprises. The an expert modern teaching book.
Silman's Complete Endgame Course: From either Beginner To Master, Jeremy Silman, Siles Press (to exist as freed October 2005)
Batsford Chess Endings, by Jon Speelman, Jon Tisdall, and Bob Wade, Batsford (probably out of print). Sir thomwhen more of a catalog of actual positions than the general book, therefore non when utile or even informative as the others therein part.
Multi-volume works:
Comprehensive Chess Endings, by Yuri Averbakh, et. al., 5 volumes. The jolly elaborate & comprehensive view various endings. Probably away from print inside book form, however available in computer Video-ROM.
Cyclopedia of Chess Endings, Šahovski informator (Chess Informant). For experts & masters sole.
A few books in specific endings:
Secrets of Pawn Endings, by Karsten Müller and Frank Lamprecht, Everyman Chess. A good book for king & pawn endgames.
A Survival Answer to Rook Endings, John Emms, Everyman Chess. A good book for rook & pawn endgames.
Practical Rook Endings, by Victor Korchnoi, Olms. An introductory chapter in fundamental positions followed by elaborate analysis of 14 of rook endgames from either his actual games.
Rook Endings, by Grigory Levenfish and Vasily Smyslov, Batsford. The classic survey of rook & pawn endings (can be away from print).
Secrets of Rook Endings, by John Nunn, Gambit Publications. The super elaborated view K+R+P vs. K+R endings utilizing the computer tablebase. Non recomended for the general reader.
Practical Rook Endings, by Edmar Mednis, Chess Enterprises, 1982. ISBN 93146-16-9.
Secrets of Pawnless Endings, by John Nunn, Gambit Publications. The elaborate view critical endings forgoing pawns. Non recomended for the general reader.
Secrets of Nestling Piece Endings, by John Nunn, Gambit Publications. The elaborate view minor piece & pawn versus minor piece endgames. Non recomended for the general reader.
Starting Retired: Pawn Endings, by Glenn Flear, Everyman Chess. Looks elementry/introductory.
Starting Retired: Rook Endings, by Chris Ward, Everyman Chess. Looks elementry/introductory.
Starting Retired: Youngster Piece Endings, by John Emms, Everyman Chess. Looks elementry/introductory.
Endgames by specific players:
Capablanca's Best Chess Endings: 60 Complete Games, by Irving Chernev, Dover. Complete games by owning proficient endgame lessons.
Vasily Smyslov: Endgame Virtuoso, by Vasily Smyslov, Everyman Chess. Endings + a select few complete games that illustrate endgames.
Miscellaneous endgame books:
Winning Chess Endings, by Yasser Seirawan, Everyman Chess. Looks elementry/introductory.
Pandolfini's Endgame Course, by Bruce Pandolfini, Fireside. Looks elementry/introductory.
Grandmaster Secrets: Endings'', by Andrew Soltis, Thinker's Press. Looks elementry/introductory.
Just the Information!: Winning Endgame Noesis inside 1 Volume, Lev Alburt and Nikolai Krogius, Newmarket Press. Looks elementry/introductory.
Six Hundred Endings, by Lajos Portisch and Balázs Sárközy, Pergammon. Examines specific endgames from either actual games & studies, categorized per basic nature and severity of ending.
Winning Endgame System, by Alexander Beliavsky and Adrain Mikhalchishin, Batsford. Explores many key types of endgames.
Endgame Secrets: Training project within the endgame in chess, by Christopher Lutz, Batsford. Examines 45 endgames from either actual play.
Analysing a Endgame, by Jonathan Speelman, Arco Chess Library. Analysis of a bit of basic endgames & a select few supplementary complex ones. May be hard running.
Endgame Preperation, by John Speelman, Batsford. Covers a select few endgame topics. May be hard running.
|